
Massive transfusion
Bottom line
- Decide early, using the whole picture. Combine physiology, injury pattern, mechanism and the response to resuscitation. Use the shock index and pulse pressure to judge how much blood the patient will need.1
- Give plasma and platelets with the red cells. In PROPPR, 1:1:1 did not lower mortality compared with 1:1:2, but fewer patients bled to death in 24 hours (9.2% vs 14.6%).2 The guideline wants plasma to red cells of at least 1:2, or fibrinogen with red cells.1
- Tranexamic acid within 3 hours: 1 g over 10 minutes, then 1 g over 8 hours.1 In CRASH-2, it helped most within 1 hour, and after 3 hours it raised the risk of death from bleeding.3
- Keep ionized calcium normal. Each unit of red cells or plasma carries about 3 g of citrate. Correct calcium with calcium chloride.1
- Accept a lower blood pressure until the bleeding stops: systolic 80–90 mm Hg. In severe brain injury, keep the MAP at 80 or higher.1
Who needs it
Massive transfusion means replacing more than one blood volume in 24 hours, or more than half of it in 4 hours. An adult's blood volume is about 70 mL/kg.4 Don't wait for that definition to be met. Activate when you expect it.4,1
- Shock index (heart rate ÷ systolic BP) is normally 0.5–0.7. Values of 0.9–1.0 or higher were associated with massive transfusion.1 Across 35 studies, it was 68% sensitive and 84% specific, too weak to use alone.5
- Narrow pulse pressure under 30 mm Hg was associated with massive transfusion (OR 3.74).1
- Mechanism: falls from 6 m (20 ft) or more, entrapment, and high-energy impacts point to major bleeding.1
- Repeat the hemoglobin. A normal first value can hide early bleeding.1
- Lactate, or base deficit if lactate isn't available, tracks bleeding and hypoperfusion.1
| ABC score: 1 point each | Present? |
|---|---|
| Penetrating mechanism | +1 |
| Positive FAST | +1 |
| Arrival systolic BP ≤ 90 mm Hg | +1 |
| Arrival heart rate ≥ 120/min | +1 |
A score of 2 or more was 75% sensitive and 86% specific for massive transfusion in the derivation cohort (n = 596).6 The guideline notes that no prediction score is in widespread use, and none has strong prospective validation.1
First 15 minutes
- Stop the bleeding you can reach. Press on open wounds. Use a tourniquet for life-threatening limb bleeding, and a pelvic binder for a suspected pelvic fracture.1
- Activate the massive transfusion protocol and call for definitive control. An obvious source, or shock in extremis with a likely source, needs an immediate bleeding-control procedure.1
- Give tranexamic acid if you are within 3 hours of injury. Don't wait for a viscoelastic test.1
- Transfuse in ratio: plasma and red cells at least 1:2, or fibrinogen (or cryoprecipitate) with red cells, plus a high platelet ratio.1
- Limit crystalloid. Target systolic 80–90 mm Hg until bleeding is controlled. Add norepinephrine if fluids alone don't reach the target.1
- Send labs now and repeat them: PT/INR, Clauss fibrinogen, platelets, and viscoelastic testing if you have it. Check ionized calcium on the blood gas.1
- Warm the patient and keep warming. Remove wet clothing.1
Products and doses
| Agent | Adult dose | When |
|---|---|---|
| Antifibrinolytic | ||
| Tranexamic acid | 1 g IV over 10 min, then 1 g over 8 h | Bleeding or at risk, within 3 h of injury (grade 1A).1 |
| Coagulation | ||
| Fibrinogen | 3–4 g first dose: 15–20 single-donor units of cryoprecipitate, or 3–4 g of concentrate | Major bleeding with fibrinogen ≤ 1.5 g/L (150 mg/dL) or a viscoelastic deficit.1 |
| Platelets | 4–8 single units, or 1 apheresis pack | Keep above 50,000/µL; above 100,000/µL with brain injury.1 |
| Plasma (after the first round) | Guided by labs | PT or APTT more than 1.5 times normal, or a viscoelastic factor deficit.1 |
| Calcium chloride 10% | 10 mL contains 270 mg calcium | Preferred for low ionized calcium. 10 mL of 10% gluconate holds only 90 mg.1 |
| Anticoagulant reversal | ||
| Warfarin | PCC plus vitamin K 5–10 mg IV | Early, in any bleeding trauma patient (grade 1A).1 |
| Dabigatran | Idarucizumab 5 g IV | Life-threatening bleeding.1 |
| Apixaban, rivaroxaban | Andexanet alfa, or PCC 25–50 U/kg | Life-threatening bleeding. PCC if andexanet is unavailable, or for edoxaban.1 |
Unreviewed doses. Verify against the current label and your institution's protocol before giving anything.
Doses from the European guideline text.1 Recombinant factor VIIa is not first-line; consider it only when everything else has failed.1 Don't give routine platelets just because a bleeding patient takes antiplatelet drugs.1
Targets once labs are back
| Measure | Target |
|---|---|
| Systolic BP, no brain injury | 80–90 mm Hg (MAP 50–60) until bleeding stops1 |
| MAP, severe brain injury (GCS ≤ 8) | ≥ 80 mm Hg1 |
| Hemoglobin, if transfusing | 7–9 g/dL1 |
| Fibrinogen | Treat at ≤ 150 mg/dL (1.5 g/L)1 |
| Platelets | > 50,000/µL; > 100,000/µL with brain injury1 |
| Ionized calcium | Normal, 4.4–5.2 mg/dL (1.1–1.3 mmol/L)1 |
| Temperature | Normothermia, 36–37 °C1 |
What the trials show
- PROPPR (n = 680): 1:1:1 vs 1:1:2 plasma, platelets and red cells. Mortality at 24 hours was 12.7% vs 17.0%, and at 30 days 22.4% vs 26.1%. Neither difference was significant. Hemostasis was more common with 1:1:1 (86% vs 78%), and exsanguination deaths fell (9.2% vs 14.6%). Complications did not differ.2
- CRASH-2 (n = 20,211): tranexamic acid lowered all-cause mortality (14.5% vs 16.0%) and death from bleeding (4.9% vs 5.7%).7
- PATCH-Trauma (n = 1,310): prehospital tranexamic acid did not improve survival with a good functional outcome at 6 months (53.7% vs 53.5%). Death at 28 days was lower (17.3% vs 21.8%), a secondary outcome.8
- CRYOSTAT-2 (n = 1,604): early, empiric high-dose cryoprecipitate added to standard care did not change 28-day mortality (25.3% vs 26.1%).9
Before hospital, and whole blood
- PAMPer (n = 501): thawed plasma during air transport lowered 30-day mortality (23.2% vs 33.0%).10
- RePHILL (n = 432): red cells plus freeze-dried plasma were no better than saline for a composite of death or poor lactate clearance. The trial stopped early because of COVID-19.11
- Whole blood vs components, before hospital (n = 1,020): 30-day mortality was 25.9% vs 20.5%, not significantly different.12
- Whole blood, pooled data (40 studies, 38 of them observational): civilian patients had lower 24-hour mortality (OR 0.73), with wide variation between studies.13
Prehospital blood: PAMPer found a mortality benefit and RePHILL did not, so the European guideline makes no recommendation either way.10,11,1 Whole blood looks better than components in mostly observational data, but the one large prehospital randomized trial found no benefit.13,12

Complications to watch
- Low calcium: citrate in each unit binds calcium, and a shocked liver clears it slowly. Correct ionized calcium below 0.9 mmol/L (3.6 mg/dL) promptly. Below 0.8 mmol/L, arrhythmias become more likely.1
- In 7,431 trauma patients, 9.8% developed severe hypocalcemia within 48 hours. More red cell units independently predicted it, and it was associated with death.14
- No trial yet shows that treating low calcium improves survival.1
- Hypothermia impairs clotting; each 1 °C drop cuts coagulation factor function by about 10%. Lab clotting tests run at 37 °C will miss this.1
- Also expect high potassium, citrate-related alkalosis, and transfusion lung injury. Check labs every 30–60 minutes during massive transfusion.4
Pitfalls
- Waiting for a low hemoglobin. The first value can be normal while the patient bleeds.1
- Starting tranexamic acid more than 3 hours after injury.3,1
- Running red cells alone for the first several units. Plasma belongs in the first round, with a high platelet ratio.1,2
- Forgetting calcium, or replacing it with gluconate ampules that hold a third of the calcium in chloride.1
- Applying permissive hypotension to a patient with severe brain injury.1
- Letting the patient get cold in the resuscitation bay.1
How strong is the evidence?
Tranexamic acid within 3 hours and warfarin reversal carry grade 1A recommendations.1 The product ratio, fibrinogen, platelet and calcium recommendations are graded 1C or 2, and the guideline calls the ratio data equivocal.1 PROPPR missed its mortality endpoints.2 Prediction scores are mostly retrospective.1,5
On-shift teaching
Questions to ask a learner at the bedside. Tap a question to see the answer. Every answer uses facts cited above.
Q1What are the four items of the ABC score, and what score triggers concern?
Q2Did PROPPR show that 1:1:1 saves lives?
Q3A patient arrives 4 hours after injury. Should you start tranexamic acid?
Q4Why does massive transfusion lower calcium, and which salt should you give?
Q5What blood pressure do you target before the bleeding is controlled?
Q6How much fibrinogen do you give, and when?
References
What this page is built on
14 sources, cited 80 times. Dots are sources, filled by how far each was read; stronger color means a larger share of the citations. Tap a tier to see its sources.
Checked by the writer, not a physician. The dots show how each source was read, not that anyone has confirmed the claims.
- 1Rossaint R, Afshari A, Bouillon B, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):80.
- 2Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(5):471–482.
- 3CRASH-2 collaborators; Roberts I, Shakur H, et al. The importance of early treatment with tranexamic acid in bleeding trauma patients: an exploratory analysis of the CRASH-2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9771):1096–1101.
- 4Nickson C. Massive transfusion protocol. Life in the Fast Lane Critical Care Compendium; November 2024.
- 5Carsetti A, Antolini R, Casarotta E, et al. Shock index as predictor of massive transfusion and mortality in patients with trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2023;27(1):85.
- 6Nunez TC, Voskresensky IV, Dossett LA, et al. Early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: simple as ABC (assessment of blood consumption)? J Trauma. 2009;66(2):346–352.
- 7CRASH-2 trial collaborators; Shakur H, Roberts I, et al. Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2). Lancet. 2010;376(9734):23–32.
- 8PATCH-Trauma Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group; Gruen RL, Mitra B, et al. Prehospital tranexamic acid for severe trauma. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(2):127–136.
- 9Davenport R, Curry N, Fox EE, et al. Early and empirical high-dose cryoprecipitate for hemorrhage after traumatic injury: the CRYOSTAT-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2023;330(19):1882–1891.
- 10Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Brown JB, et al. Prehospital plasma during air medical transport in trauma patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock (PAMPer). N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):315–326.
- 11Crombie N, Doughty HA, Bishop JRB, et al. Resuscitation with blood products in patients with trauma-related haemorrhagic shock receiving prehospital care (RePHILL). Lancet Haematol. 2022;9(4):e250–e261.
- 12Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Cotton BA, et al. Prehospital resuscitation with type O whole blood for trauma and hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2026;394(23):2317–2328.
- 13Ibrahim W, Meza Monge K, Menzel J, et al. Whole-blood vs component therapy in adult trauma: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2026;161(5):497–506.
- 14Byerly S, Inaba K, Biswas S, et al. Transfusion-related hypocalcemia after trauma. World J Surg. 2020;44(11):3743–3750.
AI-generated draft. Not reviewed by a physician. This page is for education only and may contain errors, including in doses. Do not use it to diagnose, treat or make decisions about any patient. Rely on your own clinical judgment, your institution's protocols and current drug labeling. Reading this page does not create a physician-patient relationship. Full terms